Elizabeth Holmes was found guilty of four of the federal offenses she faced.

4th January, 2022.      //   Crime  // 

Elizabeth Holmes, the former CEO and founder of failing blood testing business Theranos, was convicted guilty on four charges of cheating investors, completing off the spectacular downfall of a former tech icon.
378244f0-7997-11e5-a95a-27d368e1ddf7
She was found not guilty on three further charges of deceiving patients and one allegation of conspiracy to deceive patients. The jury returned no verdict on three of the accusations related cheating investors, and Judge Edward Davila, who is presiding over the case, is expected to declare a mistrial on those charges.

One accusation of conspiracy to defraud investors, as well as three wire fraud counts related to specific investors, were among the charges against Holmes. For each count, Holmes faces up to 20 years in jail and a sentence of $250,000 plus restitution. Holmes walked out of the courthouse with her partner, Billy Evans, her mother, and father in tow. She was surrounded by cameras and reporters, but she declined to react in response to queries hurled at her from the reporters. United States of America issued a statement saying that it The verdict was praised by attorney Stephanie Hinds.

“The jurors in this 15-week trial navigated a complex case amid a pandemic and scheduling obstacles,” she said, in a statement that was read aloud by a spokesperson outside the courthouse. “The guilty verdicts in this case reflect Ms. Holmes’ culpability in this large-scale investor fraud, and she must now face sentencing for her crimes.”

Notably, the jury of eight men and four women determined that Holmes was guilty on counts pertaining to investors, but none of the counts that pertained to defrauding patients. Over the course of its 11-week case, the government called just three patient witnesses to the stand, two of whom were individually tied to wire fraud counts.
The jury deliberated for over 50 hours before returning a verdict on eight of the 11 charges. Earlier Monday, the jury returned a note indicating they could not reach a unanimous verdict on three of the counts. In response, Judge Davila issued what is known as an Allen charge, instructing them to continue deliberating to try to reach a verdict.
However, hours later, the jury returned another note that indicated it remained unable to reach a verdict on those counts. The counts pertained to three of the investor wire fraud charges.
The verdict comes after a trial that spanned over three months at a federal courthouse in San Jose. More than 30 witnesses testified during the trial, culminating with Holmes, who took the stand for seven days in her own defense.
Holmes’ case marked a rare criminal fraud trial of a Silicon Valley entrepreneur. Jurors were tasked with determining whether Holmes was a well-meaning founder who made mistakes as she built her startup, as her defense posited, or whether she intentionally deceived investors and patients in order to help herself and her company succeed, as federal prosecutors alleged.
220103190148-02-elizabeth-holmes-theranos-fraud-trial-0103-sketch-medium-plus-169

While Holmes was the one on trial, the outcome of her case could serve as a cautionary tale for others in Silicon Valley. “This is a verdict that should matter not just to Silicon Valley but to the people who celebrate it, invest in it and use its products,” said Margaret O’Mara, a historian of the tech industry and professor at the University of Washington. “She was made possible by a Valley business culture that celebrated and encouraged very young, marginally experienced people.” George Demos, a former Securities and Exchange Commission prosecutor and adjunct law professor at the UC Davis School of Law, called the verdict “a significant win for the government and sends a powerful signal to Silicon Valley that fraud cannot masquerade as innovation.”
While much of Silicon Valley has tried to distance itself from Theranos for a variety of reasons, including that the startup was a medical device manufacturer, the power and control Holmes wielded over Theranos had all the trappings of a tech company, O’Mara said. “She was not just the CEO,” O’Mara said, “she was a very powerful CEO in the Silicon Valley model.”

  • Linkedin

  • Pinterest

  • Youtube